ILLUSTRATIVE WORKFLOW
What the experience could look like.
A team member asks a policy question. The assistant retrieves relevant passages, cites the document and page, and requests review when the evidence is insufficient.
DELIVERABLES / AGREED IN YOUR SCOPE
What a focused build includes.
An approved knowledge collection
Document inventory, ingestion rules, source identity and a refresh process.
A grounded assistant
Search, cited answers, insufficient-evidence handling and a usable interface.
Access and integration
Agreed user permissions, document access boundaries and a supported integration.
An evaluation report
Representative questions, retrieval checks, unsupported-answer tests, latency and usage cost.
ACCEPTANCE
Measure the workflow, not the demo.
Compare answer support, source relevance, task completion time and cost against the existing search process. Acceptance thresholds are agreed using your examples.
BEFORE THE BUILD
Bring the inputs and the decision owner.
Approved documents, representative questions, document owners and access rules. Sensitive records require an agreed handling plan before ingestion.
RELEVANT FOUNDER EVIDENCE
Engineering you can inspect.
RegImpact AI demonstrates hybrid retrieval and evidence-linked review in an independent founder project.
SCOPE AND RESPONSIBILITY
Define the operating boundary.
RAG connects retrieved context to generation; citations alone do not establish correctness. We evaluate supported answers and failure cases before extending use.